Be the Duck, and Not the Fish.

In JD Salinger’s Catcher in the Rye, Holden Caulfield often wonders where all the ducks in Central Park go during the winter. He’s told by a cab driver, that the ducks aren’t important, but it’s the fish he should be concerned about, because the fish get frozen in place, and their bodies feed off of themselves, and suck in certain nutrients during that time in order to stay alive while they’re unable to move. I think the cabbie had it right.

No matter the season, we, as people, are the fish. We are frozen in place, and feed only off of what comes in direct contact with us, or what we’ve already stored inside of us. It’s a fantastic metaphor for Holden, as well as people in general, as we are so trapped inside our heads, that we are unable to search for any new meaning to anything – at least not until, in Holden’s case, his kid sister, Phoebe, knocks some sense into him. But what is our Phoebe?

Chuck Palahniuk tells us that we are the combined effort of all we’ve known. And he’s right, but is that really a good thing? “All we’ve known” is deceiving. Too many people are unwilling to know anything else. I watch my students suffer from this problem on a daily basis. They know everything they care to know already, so why should they learn anything new? Why should they read a book, or write a research essay, or listen to a lecture, or discuss a poem, or passage, or anything that deals with new knowledge. Some of them are barely fish – barely even feeding off of that which they come in direct contact.

I’m guilty of this as well. I spent a good portion of my life being stubborn, and unwilling to open myself up to new things. I enjoyed living in my little box, and not progressing much beyond what I already knew. But then I grew up. I realized that there was a whole world out there that I needed to understand.

So, why can’t we be the ducks? Why can’t we disappear for a season, travel toward new understanding, and get a new perspective on life. If we are the combined efforts of all we’ve known, then we need to know a lot more than we already do, because frankly, we know very little about a very tiny fragment of the world around us, and that fragment grows smaller each day we’re unwilling to disappear for a season.

Do yourself a favor – as I’ve done for myself – learn something new. Experience new people, new ideas, new books, poems, films, states, cities, countries. Do anything, and everything you can to widen your knowledge about anything and everything. In essence, be the duck, and not the fish.

TWITTERVIEW: Marc Maron, on Art Museums and Shooting Guns with William Burroughs.

Maron.Marc - Noah Kalina

Marc Maron is a stand up comedian who began his career under the tutelage of Sam Kinison. He hosts a podcast, works on his IFC show Maron, has appeared in stand-up specials on HBO and Comedy Central, as well as done voice bits for Dr. Katz. He’s appeared more than 40 times on the Conan O’Brien show, and is known for his politically driven comedy. When I approached him for an email interview, he asked if we could just do it live on Twitter. So, without further adieu, here is my Twitterview with Marc Maron.

****************************

“Make Silence Your Friend”

I’ve made a deal with my students that I will perform a piece at a local poetry slam on May 26th. Even writing that down here means that I have to follow through with my promise. Then again, even writing that down here makes me nervous. I’ve written the piece that I want to perform, and it’s heavy. The subject matter is not suitable for everyone, but it’s very honest, and after watching a few slam poetry events, I know that it fits in with the overall feel of what people have been performing. I think I’m more nervous about the subject matter because it’s opening myself up to some of my students, and that’s an odd line to walk at times.

The other hitch in my proverbial giddy-up is that I suffer from social anxiety disorder, and while I stay fairly medicated, it doesn’t mean that standing on stage, and performing a piece about my world to a group of complete strangers, and a handful of students doesn’t make the lump in my throat go down any easier. It’s funny though, because I play music on a regular basis – live music, in front of a lot of people. In fact, I’m playing a show tonight for 300+ people, and I’ll be perfectly fine. The playing portion is okay; frankly, it’s the getting onto the stage that is the issue. Once I’m there, I feel great. I’m alive. I strum a few chords, sing a few lines, and I feel at home. But I typically arrive several hours early, have a drink to relax my mind, and wait, and wait, and wait, and wait for load in, and set up, and soundcheck, and then continue the waiting process until I play. I’ve gotten a lot better over the years. I’m not angry before shows anymore. I no longer hide in the corners. I’ve been doing shows for 17 years, so why does this poetry slam bother me so much?

It’s the waiting. It’s the fact that the only people I’ll know are a handful of students. It’s the fact that I can’t hide behind my guitar, and that the only thing I’ll have as my crutch is the microphone, and my piece of paper – if I don’t memorize the whole thing. I know I’ll be calm once I start the piece. And it’s a very accepting and open crowd. I’ve seen people truly mess up, forget lines, get rattled, voices crack, and the audience cheers them on to keep going, and gives them praise. I know that I can do this.

Taylor Mali’s advice is right on point: If my hands shake, I should memorize my piece. If they don’t, then I need to make silence my friend. Well, my hands don’t shake, and I love making people listen to my words. I thrive off of the silence during a solo set, when you know that every ear is straining to hear each and every syllable. I can do this. It’s just the waiting. Damn you Tom Petty. The waiting really is the hardest part.

QOTD – Even the Masters Found Inspiration Somewhere; How About You?

Inspiration comes to everyone in vastly different ways. It might be a parent, or a sibling, or a teacher, or television star. It might be the mailman, the police officer, the street preacher, or the homeless man on the corner. There’s always a light bulb moment, but never a clear sign that it’s going to turn on, or that you’ll even notice the change in brightness. Inspiration is nowhere near an exact science, but it happens to all of us – just depends on whether or not we are willing to actually see it for what it is.

I’ve asked a lot of celebrities who their main influences are, and while I’m received a lot in return, the ones listed above were ones that caught me off guard. Sadat X, member of Brand Nubian, actually lists someone who’s CD doesn’t even come out for another month. Obviously, he’s looking at current inspiration. Scarface, the rapper, turned to Gene Simmons from KISS as his inspiration. This totally threw me, because they are from completely different worlds. Then I took a moment to realize they are both incredibly theatrical on stage, and understand how to build a marketing machine. It was an important discovery, and lead to my biggest profits ever. The Ralphie May one wasn’t so odd to me. I can definitely see some Sam Kinison in his act. Kinison was a master of timing, and as Ralphie points out, “Controlled Chaos.” Truer words could never have been written about comedy, and writing. It’s all controlled chaos.

My question to you requires a bit of thought beyond the normal go-to answers. I want to know who really inspired you. Don’t give me the “My parents are wonderful” line if they aren’t the ones who actually inspired you to do what you are doing now, or will do in the future.

Who is your biggest inspiration?

QOTD – What Makes for a Good Poem?

 

One of our Twitter followers, Jose Alba, asked us this question yesterday, and I wanted to post my response on the site. I work hard with my students to get them to understand that when it comes to poetry, they just really need to say what they want to say, and not hide behind obtuse metaphors.

When I got to Pacific University, I made the same mistake as many other young “poets,” and felt like I knew everything. I even had a “book” of poems called Artificial Grey, that I had typed up, and had spiral bound. I think I made 10 copies of it to give to my family and friends. I also thought it would be a great idea to give it to my poetry advisor, Professor Walls. I felt like he should know how fantastic I was. He gave me a faint smile (one that I give my high school students when they now hand me their books), and gladly accepted my work. Instead of just throwing it away, he went through each poem in the book – I think there were close to 200 – and edited them all.

He never gave me any guff about it, and instead, worked hard to let me see exactly what I needed to do in order to better my writing. I had a class with Professor Walls every semester of college, and I owe him quite a bit when it comes to helping me figure out my style of writing – with poetry, fiction, and editorials. It’s a professor like that who is needed for young poets – young anything really.

So, I ask you the same question we were asked:

What makes for a good poem?

“The Role of Art,” or “Do I Need More Therapy?”

321425_583121685054898_1873842687_n

 

I want so badly to agree with the statement that “Art should comfort the disturbed and disturb the comfortable.” It seems like such a bold proclamation, and frankly, one that should be more than justifiable; however, I don’t know if that truly sums up the role of Art. Can’t Art simply comfort? Can’t Art make a person question, or discuss, or disgusted? Can’t Art make people notice their surroundings, their generation, their voice, their role in history? It doesn’t all have to be comfortable or disturbing. Right?

On the other hand, the word “disturb” can be taken in several different ways. It is the job of an artist to bring something to the attention of the viewer, or listener. It is the job of the artist make a person feel. So, maybe “disturbing the comfortable” is doing just that. Maybe the comfortable isn’t used to feeling or having to think about certain things outside their comfort-zone. If that’s the case, than this quote is incredibly accurate.

Does “comforting the disturbed” mean that a disturbed mind will be eased by something that others may find unsettling? Since Poetry is counted as art, does that mean that if I’m comforted by Browning’s “Porphyria’s Lover,” that I’m a bad person, or a disturbed person? If I find that poem to be one of the most honest love poems ever written, does that mean that I need more therapy than I already receive? I don’t feel like I want to murder anyone, let alone the woman who I love, but in that poem, his love is so unrequited, and so maligned that he feels it’s the only way they’ll ever be together. Now, Browning’s poem never alludes whether or not the strangulation of Porphyria is real, or simply in the lover’s head, but either way, when he wraps her hair around her throat, it’s dark, but immensely beautiful at the same time.

I love Jackson Pollock paintings, but they are violent in nature. The paint is splattered, and thrown, and while they may not seem like “art” to some, to me, much like the Browning poem, I find them beautiful. Is that wrong?

I love the smooth sounds of the Miles Davis Quintet era, but I also love the scattered, and dangerous Bitches Brew album. Is it comforting or disturbing? Right or wrong? Is there an answer to that question?

I agree that art is meant to force, or focus, or provide emotion for people, but I do not think you only get to options. I do not believe that art is there to provide comfort or disturbance. Art is there to promote thought, and whatever those thoughts are, as long as when a person thinks something, the artist has done their job.

The Daily Prompt – May 13th

Rules:

  1. Use the prompt in the way it’s intended (starting a sentence, the title of the piece, theme, etc)
  2. You may write in any format you see fit (fiction, non-fiction, poem, song, script, etc.)
  3. Post your piece of writing in the comments section of the website to be considered for the prizes given
  4. The winner of each daily prompt will be published on the site in “Best of The Daily Prompt” section.

The Daily Prompt:

Twitter has become a force in the world of social media, allowing celebrities to communicate with their fans, teenagers to leave short messages for everyone to see, and news sources to communicate with more immediacy than ever. It’s crazy to think that 140 characters – including spaces – can be the window to so much information. It can be a very difficult task to write the perfect “tweet.”

You must compose a short story in no more than 140 characters – including spaces.

It is best to open up your Twitter account to make sure that your tweet is the correct length. If you don’t have Twitter, you will need to rely on the character count function on whatever Word program you use.

Grammar Police – Oprah “Thanx” the Mothers

Grammar Police: Oprah Winfrey

I know it’s mother’s day, and I understand that Oprah was simply giving a “shout out” to all the mothers, but she had enough characters to not screw this one up so badly. Oprah needs to realize that with so many followers, many of whom attempt to model their lives after her words, she has to be careful about everything – including grammar. I don’t expect her to tweet back. I don’t actually think she writes her own tweet – which, frankly, makes this even worse. If she’s hired someone who has made her seem grammatically challenged, she should be ashamed of herself. She is an intelligent woman, and being as such, I expect better from her.

The Daily Prompt

We’re starting a new daily posting to go along with our Question of the Day. This one is The Daily Prompt. We know that the majority of our readers are writers, or at least dabble in the craft on occasion. We would love to see what you can do with the prompt each day.

Rules:

  1. Use the prompt in the way it’s intended (starting a sentence, the title of the piece, theme, etc)
  2. You may write in any format you see fit (fiction, non-fiction, poem, song, script, etc.)
  3. Post your piece of writing in the comments section of the website to be considered for the prizes given
  4. The winner of each daily prompt will be published on the site in “Best of The Daily Prompt” section

The Daily Prompt:

Start your piece with the line, “It took 7 hours, 48 minutes, and 16 seconds to…”

Who Cares What Your Mommy Thinks?

We all have a “Watcher,” a little being that sits on our shoulder, like a conscience, that reminds us of how terrible we are as writers, or artists, or as whatever we’re deciding to be that day. It’s inevitable that at several points in our lives, we will be over-taken by the words of our watcher, put down our tool of choice, and walk away with the feeling of utter frustration and pain. We are, after all, our own worst enemies, and the watcher is our own creation. In my Creative Writing class, I have my students draw a picture of their watcher, and explain its origin. It’s always interesting to see how many students draw their mother, or father, or a former teacher. I always wonder if it’s more than one of those people pushed them to work harder, and not simply that they were their toughest critic for the sake of being a critic.

In Gail Godwin’s essay, “The Watcher at the Gates,” she tells us that we must “outsmart, pacify, or coexist with your Watcher.” She gives us tools to work with when our watcher wants us to be constant pencil sharpeners, or dictionary lookers, or coffee drinkers. Setting timers when we write. Writing until the teapot sounds. For me, I write like to write where I know I’m being watched: my classroom while students are working (as I’m doing now), in a crowded mall where I feel uncomfortable, on a park bench in downtown Portland, or on a very specific tree at Cannon Beach. I guess in a way, I like my watcher to feel like it is being watched as well. It’s harder to doubt oneself, when the watcher feel uncomfortable.

It is not easy to avoid self-doubt. It’s the one thing that holds the majority of us back. I’m no stranger to the watcher. I finished a novel more than five years ago, only to be told that I needed to revise it one more time before the publishing company would take another look at it. I was upset, and frustrated, and chose the road most taken – which was to unfortunately shelve the book, and not do what I needed to do in order to possibly call myself a published novelist. I was scared of something, and frankly, it was the fear that I wasn’t as good as I thought I was. When I wrote the original draft, I wasn’t thinking about how anyone else would feel. I was just writing. It came out naturally, and easily, and a lot faster than I had ever imagined. But when I was told that someone else had issues with certain parts, it hurt me, and I didn’t take it as constructive criticism, but rather just criticism. I should have said “thank you,” hung up the phone, and completed the re-writes over the next few weeks. Instead, it sat until this last summer when I finally decided I would finish it up. Now, I’m sitting on it again, waiting to submit it, all because of the mystery watcher that questions if it’s really all that good.

As Elmore Leonard points out, we cannot “worry about what [our] mother[s] think of [our] language.” If we do, then we are bound to fail. Art is not about what other people think – at least not in the early stages. Creation is our job. Once we are finished with a product, and that product hits the world of public opinion, it is everyone’s to judge, but as long as we are satisfied, then it should never matter.